Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tourasse, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Li, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tourasse, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Li, W. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 16, 1068-1078, Copyright © 1999 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Performance of the relative-rate test under nonstationary models of nucleotide substitution

NJ Tourasse and WH Li
Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.

Relative-rate tests have previously been developed to compare the substitution rates of two sequences or two groups of sequences. These tests usually assume that the process of nucleotide substitution is stationary and the same for all lineages, i.e., uniform. In this study, we conducted simulations to assess the performance of the relative-rate tests when the molecular-clock (MC) hypothesis is true (i.e., there is no rate difference between lineages), but the stationarity and uniformity assumptions are violated. Kimura's and bias-corrected LogDet distances were used. We found that the computation of the variances and covariances of LogDet distances had to be modified, because the constraint that the sum of the frequencies of the 16 nucleotide pair types is equal to 1 must be imposed. Comparison of the rates of two single sequences (Wu and Li's test) or two groups of sequences (Li and Bousquet's test) gave similar results. When the sequences are long (> or = 500 nt), the test based on LogDet distances and their appropriate variances and covariances is appropriate even when the substitution process is not stationary and/or not uniform. That is, at the 5% significance level, the test rejects the MC hypothesis in about 5% of the simulation replicates. In contrast, if the sequences are short (< or = 200 bases) and highly divergent, the LogDet test is very conservative due to overestimation of the variances of the distances. When the uniformity assumption is violated, the relative-rate test based on Kimura's distances can be severely misleading because of differences in base composition between sequences. However, if the uniformity assumption held and so the base frequencies remained similar among sequences, the rate of rejection turned out to be close to 5%, especially with short sequences. Under such conditions, the test using Kimura's distances performs better than the LogDet test. The reason seems to be that these distances are less affected by a reduction in the number of sites than the LogDet distances because they depend on only two parameters.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. T. Herbeck, P. H. Degnan, and J. J. Wernegreen
Nonhomogeneous Model of Sequence Evolution Indicates Independent Origins of Primary Endosymbionts Within the Enterobacteriales ({gamma}-Proteobacteria)
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2005; 22(3): 520 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of PaleontologyHome page
MOLECULAR CLOCK DIVERGENCE ESTIMATES AND THE FOSSIL RECORD OF CETARTIODACTYLA
Journal of Paleontology, January 1, 2004; 78(1): 39 - 44.



Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. S. Rosenberg and S. Kumar
Heterogeneity of Nucleotide Frequencies Among Evolutionary Lineages and Phylogenetic Inference
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2003; 20(4): 610 - 621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
K. Tamura and S. Kumar
Evolutionary Distance Estimation Under Heterogeneous Substitution Pattern Among Lineages
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2002; 19(10): 1727 - 1736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
R. Tarrio, F. Rodriguez-Trelles, and F. J. Ayala
Shared Nucleotide Composition Biases Among Species and Their Impact on Phylogenetic Reconstructions of the Drosophilidae
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2001; 18(8): 1464 - 1473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
F. Rodriguez-Trelles, R. Tarrio, and F. J. Ayala
Evidence for a High Ancestral GC Content in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2000; 17(11): 1710 - 1717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.