Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 16, 868-875, Copyright © 1999 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Performance of likelihood ratio tests of evolutionary hypotheses under inadequate substitution models

J Zhang
Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, Pennsylvania State University, USA. jzhang@atlas.niaid.nih.gov

In recent years, likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) based on DNA and protein sequence data have been proposed for testing various evolutionary hypotheses. Because conducting an LRT requires an evolutionary model of nucleotide or amino acid substitution, which is almost always unknown, it becomes important to investigate the robustness of LRTs to violations of assumptions of these evolutionary models. Computer simulation was used to examine performance of LRTs of the molecular clock, transition/transversion bias, and among-site rate variation under different substitution models. The results showed that when correct models are used, LRTs perform quite well even when the DNA sequences are as short as 300 nt. However, LRTs were found to be biased under incorrect models. The extent of bias varies considerably, depending on the hypotheses tested, the substitution models assumed, and the lengths of the sequences used, among other things. A preliminary simulation study also suggests that LRTs based on parametric bootstrapping may be more sensitive to substitution models than are standard LRTs. When an assumed substitution model is grossly wrong and a more realistic model is available, LRTs can often reject the wrong model; thus, the performance of LRTs may be improved by using a more appropriate model. On the other hand, many factors of molecular evolution have not been considered in any substitution models so far built, and the possibility of an influence of this negligence on LRTs is often overlooked. The dependence of LRTs on substitution models calls for caution in interpreting test results and highlights the importance of clarifying the substitution patterns of genes and proteins and building more realistic models.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
D. Pol
Empirical Problems of the Hierarchical Likelihood Ratio Test for Model Selection
Syst Biol, December 1, 2004; 53(6): 949 - 962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
O. Podlaha and J. Zhang
Nonneutral Evolution of the Transcribed Pseudogene Makorin1-p1 in Mice
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2004; 21(12): 2202 - 2209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
D. Posada and T. R. Buckley
Model Selection and Model Averaging in Phylogenetics: Advantages of Akaike Information Criterion and Bayesian Approaches Over Likelihood Ratio Tests
Syst Biol, October 1, 2004; 53(5): 793 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. Howell, J. L. Elson, D. M. Turnbull, and C. Herrnstadt
African Haplogroup L mtDNA Sequences Show Violations of Clock-like Evolution
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2004; 21(10): 1843 - 1854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. G. Hwang and P. Green
Inaugural Article: Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sequence analysis reveals varying neutral substitution patterns in mammalian evolution
PNAS, September 28, 2004; 101(39): 13994 - 14001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. Zhang
Frequent False Detection of Positive Selection by the Likelihood Method with Branch-Site Models
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2004; 21(7): 1332 - 1339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. Goldman and S. Whelan
A Novel Use of Equilibrium Frequencies in Models of Sequence Evolution
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2002; 19(11): 1821 - 1831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
Y. Suzuki and M. Nei
Simulation Study of the Reliability and Robustness of the Statistical Methods for Detecting Positive Selection at Single Amino Acid Sites
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2002; 19(11): 1865 - 1869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
P. B. Marko
Fossil Calibration of Molecular Clocks and the Divergence Times of Geminate Species Pairs Separated by the Isthmus of Panama
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2002; 19(11): 2005 - 2021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
Y. Suzuki and M. Nei
Reliabilities of Parsimony-based and Likelihood-based Methods for Detecting Positive Selection at Single Amino Acid Sites
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2001; 18(12): 2179 - 2185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Anisimova, J. P. Bielawski, and Z. Yang
Accuracy and Power of the Likelihood Ratio Test in Detecting Adaptive Molecular Evolution
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2001; 18(8): 1585 - 1592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. Posada and K. A. Crandall
Selecting Models of Nucleotide Substitution: An Application to Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 (HIV-1)
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2001; 18(6): 897 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.