Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (57)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reed, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sperling, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reed, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sperling, F. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 16, 286-297, Copyright © 1999 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Interaction of process partitions in phylogenetic analysis: an example from the swallowtail butterfly genus Papilio

RD Reed and FA Sperling
Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, USA. reed@u.arizona.edu

In this study, we explored how the concept of the process partition may be applied to phylogenetic analysis. Sequence data were gathered from 23 species and subspecies of the swallowtail butterfly genus Papilio, as well as from two outgroup species from the genera Eurytides and Pachliopta. Sequence data consisted of 1,010 bp of the nuclear protein- coding gene elongation factor-1 alpha (EF-1 alpha) as well as the entire sequences (a total of 2,211 bp) of the mitochondrial protein- coding genes cytochrome oxidase I and cytochrome oxidase II (COI and COII). In order to examine the interaction between the nuclear and mitochondrial partitions in a combined analysis, we used a method of visualizing branch support as a function of partition weight ratios. We demonstrated how this method may be used to diagnose error at different levels of a tree in a combined maximum-parsimony analysis. Further, we assessed patterns of evolution within and between subsets of the data by implementing a multipartition maximum-likelihood model to estimate evolutionary parameters for various putative process partitions. COI third positions have an estimated average substitution rate more than 15 times that of EF-1 alpha, while COII third positions have an estimated average substitution rate more than 22 times that of EF-1 alpha. Ultimately, we found that although the mitochondrial and nuclear data were not significantly incongruent, homoplasy in the fast-evolving mitochondrial data confounded the resolution of basal relationships in the combined unweighted parsimony analysis despite the fact that there was relatively strong support for the relationships in the nuclear data. We conclude that there may be shortcomings to the methods of "total evidence" and "conditional combination" because they may fail to detect or accommodate the type of confounding bias we found in our data.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
S. Koehler, J. S. Cabral, W. M. Whitten, N. H. Williams, R. B. Singer, K. M. Neubig, M. Guerra, A. P. Souza, and M. d. C. E. Amaral
Molecular Phylogeny of the Neotropical Genus Christensonella (Orchidaceae, Maxillariinae): Species Delimitation and Insights into Chromosome Evolution
Ann. Bot., October 1, 2008; 102(4): 491 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
C. Li, G. Lu, and G. Orti
Optimal Data Partitioning and a Test Case for Ray-Finned Fishes (Actinopterygii) Based on Ten Nuclear Loci
Syst Biol, August 1, 2008; 57(4): 519 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
N. Wahlberg and C. W. Wheat
Genomic Outposts Serve the Phylogenomic Pioneers: Designing Novel Nuclear Markers for Genomic DNA Extractions of Lepidoptera
Syst Biol, April 1, 2008; 57(2): 231 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. L. Prudic, J. C. Oliver, and F. A. H. Sperling
From the Cover: The signal environment is more important than diet or chemical specialization in the evolution of warning coloration
PNAS, December 4, 2007; 104(49): 19381 - 19386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
D. Rubinoff and B. S. Holland
Between Two Extremes: Mitochondrial DNA is neither the Panacea nor the Nemesis of Phylogenetic and Taxonomic Inference
Syst Biol, December 1, 2005; 54(6): 952 - 961.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
A. H. Wortley, P. J. Rudall, D. J. Harris, and R. W. Scotland
How Much Data are Needed to Resolve a Difficult Phylogeny? Case Study in Lamiales
Syst Biol, October 1, 2005; 54(5): 697 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
C.-P. Lin, B. N. Danforth, and T. K. Wood
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution of Maternal Care in Membracine Treehoppers
Syst Biol, June 1, 2004; 53(3): 400 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
E. V. Zakharov, M. S. Caterino, and F. A.H. Sperling
Molecular Phylogeny, Historical Biogeography, and Divergence Time Estimates for Swallowtail Butterflies of the Genus Papilio (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)
Syst Biol, April 1, 2004; 53(2): 193 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. C. Hedin and W. P. Maddison
Phylogenetic Utility and Evidence for Multiple Copies of Elongation Factor-1{alpha} in the Spider Genus Habronattus (Araneae: Salticidae)
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2001; 18(8): 1512 - 1521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.