Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (35)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hancock, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dover, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hancock, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dover, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 16, 253-265, Copyright © 1999 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

High sequence turnover in the regulatory regions of the developmental gene hunchback in insects

JM Hancock, PJ Shaw, F Bonneton and GA Dover
MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England.

Extensive sequence analysis of the developmental gene hunchback and its 5' and 3' regulatory regions in Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila virilis, Musca domestica, and Tribolium castaneum, using a variety of computer algorithms, reveals regions of high sequence simplicity probably generated by slippage-like mechanisms of turnover. No regions are entirely refractory to the action of slippage, although the density and composition of simple sequence motifs varies from region to region. Interestingly, the 5' and 3' flanking regions share short repetitive motifs despite their separation by the gene itself, and the motifs are different in composition from those in the exons and introns. Furthermore, there are high levels of conservation of motifs in equivalent orthologous regions. Detailed sequence analysis of the P2 promoter and DNA footprinting assays reveal that the number, orientation, sequence, spacing, and protein-binding affinities of the BICOID-binding sites varies between species and that the 'P2' promoter, the nanos response element in the 3' untranslated region, and several conserved boxes of sequence in the gene (e.g., the two zinc-finger regions) are surrounded by cryptically-simple-sequence DNA. We argue that high sequence turnover and genetic redundancy permit both the general maintenance of promoter functions through the establishment of coevolutionary (compensatory) changes in cis- and trans-acting genetic elements and, at the same time, the possibility of subtle changes in the regulation of hunchback in the different species.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Brief BioinformHome page
I. Abnizova and W. R. Gilks
Studying statistical properties of regulatory DNA sequences, and their use in predicting regulatory regions in the eukaryotic genomes
Brief Bioinform, March 1, 2006; 7(1): 48 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Lynch
The Origins of Eukaryotic Gene Structure
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2006; 23(2): 450 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
A. Force, W. A. Cresko, F. B. Pickett, S. R. Proulx, C. Amemiya, and M. Lynch
The Origin of Subfunctions and Modular Gene Regulation
Genetics, May 1, 2005; 170(1): 433 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 DevelopmentHome page
B. M. Hersh and S. B. Carroll
Direct regulation of knot gene expression by Ultrabithorax and the evolution of cis-regulatory elements in Drosophila
Development, April 1, 2005; 132(7): 1567 - 1577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Sinha and E. D. Siggia
Sequence Turnover and Tandem Repeats in cis-Regulatory Modules in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2005; 22(4): 874 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
G. A. Wray, M. W. Hahn, E. Abouheif, J. P. Balhoff, M. Pizer, M. V. Rockman, and L. A. Romano
The Evolution of Transcriptional Regulation in Eukaryotes
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2003; 20(9): 1377 - 1419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
E. T. Dermitzakis, C. M. Bergman, and A. G. Clark
Tracing the Evolutionary History of Drosophila Regulatory Regions with Models that Identify Transcription Factor Binding Sites
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2003; 20(5): 703 - 714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 MicrobiologyHome page
L. A. S. Snyder, S. A. Butcher, and N. J. Saunders
Comparative whole-genome analyses reveal over 100 putative phase-variable genes in the pathogenic Neisseria spp.
Microbiology, August 1, 2001; 147(8): 2321 - 2332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. M. Hancock, E. A. Worthey, and M. F. Santibáñez-Koref
A Role for Selection in Regulating the Evolutionary Emergence of Disease-Causing and Other Coding CAG Repeats in Humans and Mice
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2001; 18(6): 1014 - 1023.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
S. Campesan, D. Chalmers, F. Sandrelli, A. Megighian, A. A. Peixoto, R. Costa, and C. P. Kyriacou
Comparative Analysis of the nonA Region in Drosophila Identifies a Highly Diverged 5' Gene That May Constrain nonA Promoter Evolution
Genetics, February 1, 2001; 157(2): 751 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.