Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Percudani, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ottonello, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Percudani, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ottonello, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 16, 1752-1762, Copyright © 1999 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Selection at the wobble position of codons read by the same tRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

R Percudani and S Ottonello
Institute of Biochemical Sciences, University of Parma, Italy.

The transfer RNA gene complement of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was utilized for a whole-genome analysis of the deviation from a neutral usage of pyrimidine-ending cognate codons, that is, codons read by a single tRNA species having either inosine or guanosine as the first anticodon base. Mutational pressure at the wobble position was estimated from the base composition of the noncoding portion of the yeast genome. The selective pressure for translational efficiency was inferred from the degree of codon adaptation to tRNA gene redundancy and from mRNA abundance data derived from yeast transcriptome analysis. Amino acid conservation in orthologous comparisons with wholly sequenced microbial genomes was used to estimate translational accuracy requirements. A close correspondence was observed between the usage of wobble position pyrimidines and the frequency predicted by mutational bias. However, in the case of four cognate pairs (Gly: ggu/ggc; Asn: aau/aac; Phe: uuu/uuc; Tyr: uau/ uac) all read by guanosine-starting anticodons, we found evidence for a strong selective pressure driven by translational efficiency. Only for the glycine pair, wobble pyrimidine choice also appears to fulfill a translational accuracy requirement. Wobble pyrimidine selection is strictly related to the number of hydrogen bonds formed by alternative cognate codons: whenever a different number of hydrogen bonds can be formed at the wobble position, there is selection against six- or nine-hydrogen-bonded codon- anticodon pairs. Our results indicate that an intrinsic codon preference, critically dependent on the stability of codon-anticodon interaction and mainly reflecting selection for the optimization of translational efficiency, is built into the translational apparatus.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome ResHome page
E. P.C. Rocha
Codon usage bias from tRNA's point of view: Redundancy, specialization, and efficient decoding for translation optimization
Genome Res., November 1, 2004; 14(11): 2279 - 2286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. Akashi
Translational Selection and Yeast Proteome Evolution
Genetics, August 1, 2003; 164(4): 1291 - 1303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B. R. Morton
Selection at the Amino Acid Level Can Influence Synonymous Codon Usage: Implications for the Study of Codon Adaptation in Plastid Genes
Genetics, September 1, 2001; 159(1): 347 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.