Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, R. G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 16, 1575-1585, Copyright © 1999 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Cytochrome b evolution in birds and mammals: an evaluation of the avian constraint hypothesis

SE Stanley and RG Harrison
Section of Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, USA. scoob@amnh.org

Patterns of molecular evolution in birds have long been considered anomalous. Compared with other vertebrates, birds have reduced levels of genetic divergence between groups of similar taxonomic ranks for a variety of nuclear and mitochondrial markers. This observation led to the avian constraint hypothesis, which identifies increased functional constraint on avian proteins as the cause for the reduction in genetic divergence. Subsequent investigations provided additional support for the avian constraint hypothesis when rates of molecular evolution were found to be slower in birds than in mammals in a variety of independent calibrations. It is possible to test the avian constraint hypothesis as an explanation for this avian slowdown by comparing DNA sequence data from protein-coding regions in birds and homologous regions in mammals. The increased selective constraints should lead to a reduction in the proportion of amino acid replacement substitutions. To test for such a decrease, we calculated the numbers of amino acid replacement substitutions per replacement site (dN) and silent substitutions per silent site (dS) for the complete mitochondrial cytochrome b gene using 38 avian and 43 mammalian comparisons that were phylogenetically independent. We find that dN/dS is significantly smaller in birds than in mammals. This difference cannot be explained by differences in codon bias affecting dS values. We suggest that the avian slowdown can be explained, at least in part, by a decreased tolerance for amino acid substitutions in avian species relative to mammalian species.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. J. Biesiadecki, K. L. Schneider, Z.-B. Yu, S. M. Chong, and J.-P. Jin
An R111C Polymorphism in Wild Turkey Cardiac Troponin I Accompanying the Dilated Cardiomyopathy-related Abnormal Splicing Variant of Cardiac Troponin T with Potentially Compensatory Effects
J. Biol. Chem., April 2, 2004; 279(14): 13825 - 13832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. J. Biesiadecki and J.-P. Jin
Exon Skipping in Cardiac Troponin T of Turkeys with Inherited Dilated Cardiomyopathy
J. Biol. Chem., May 17, 2002; 277(21): 18459 - 18468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.