Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (71)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, A. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 15, 854-870, Copyright © 1998 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Phylogenetic tests of the hypothesis of block duplication of homologous genes on human chromosomes 6, 9, and 1

AL Hughes
Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16803, USA. austin@hugaus3.bio.psu.edu

There are 10 gene families that have members on both human chromosome 6 (6p21.3, the location of the human major histocompatibility complex [MHC]) and human chromosome 9 (mostly 9q33-34). Six of these families also have members on mouse chromosome 17 (the mouse MHC chromosome) and mouse chromosome 2. In addition, four of these families have members on human chromosome 1 (1q21-25 and 1p13), and two of these have members on mouse chromosome 1. One hypothesis to explain these patterns is that members of the 10 gene families of human chromosomes 6 and 9 were duplicated simultaneously as a result of polyploidization or duplication of a chromosome segment ("block duplication"). A subsequent block duplication has been proposed to account for the presence of representatives of four of these families on human chromosome 1. Phylogenetic analyses of the 9 gene families for which data were available decisively rejected the hypothesis of block duplication as an overall explanation of these patterns. Three to five of the genes on human chromosomes 6 and 9 probably duplicated simultaneously early in vertebrate history, prior to the divergence of jawed and jawless vertebrates, and shortly after that, all four of the genes on chromosomes 1 and 9 probably duplicated as a block. However, the other genes duplicated at different times scattered over at least 1.6 billion years. Since the occurrence of these clusters of related genes cannot be explained by block duplication, one alternative explanation is that they cluster together because of shared functional characteristics relating to expression patterns.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Klein and N. Nikolaidis
The descent of the antibody-based immune system by gradual evolution
PNAS, January 4, 2005; 102(1): 169 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. Inoue, K. Naruse, S. Yamagami, H. Mitani, N. Suzuki, and Y. Takei
Four functionally distinct C-type natriuretic peptides found in fish reveal evolutionary history of the natriuretic peptide system
PNAS, August 19, 2003; 100(17): 10079 - 10084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
R. Friedman and A. L. Hughes
The Temporal Distribution of Gene Duplication Events in a Set of Highly Conserved Human Gene Families
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2003; 20(1): 154 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
R. Friedman and A. L. Hughes
Pattern and Timing of Gene Duplication in Animal Genomes
Genome Res., November 1, 2001; 11(11): 1842 - 1847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
T. Shiina, A. Ando, Y. Suto, F. Kasai, A. Shigenari, N. Takishima, E. Kikkawa, K. Iwata, Y. Kuwano, Y. Kitamura, et al.
Genomic Anatomy of a Premier Major Histocompatibility Complex Paralogous Region on Chromosome 1q21-q22
Genome Res., May 1, 2001; 11(5): 789 - 802.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. Martin
Is Tetralogy True? Lack of Support for the "One-to-Four Rule"
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2001; 18(1): 89 - 93.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. S. Clark, P. Pontarotti, A. Gilles, A. Kelly, and G. Elgar
Identification and Characterization of a {beta} Proteasome Subunit Cluster in the Japanese Pufferfish (Fugu rubripes)
J. Immunol., October 15, 2000; 165(8): 4446 - 4452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
B. W. Murray, H. Sultmann, and J. Klein
Analysis of a 26-kb Region Linked to the Mhc in Zebrafish: Genomic Organization of the Proteasome Component {beta}/Transporter Associated with Antigen Processing-2 Gene Cluster and Identification of Five New Proteasome {beta} Subunit Genes
J. Immunol., September 1, 1999; 163(5): 2657 - 2666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. O'Regan, E. Traiffort, M. Ruat, N. Cha, D. Compaore, and F.-M. Meunier
An electric lobe suppressor for a yeast choline transport mutation belongs to a new family of transporter-like proteins
PNAS, February 15, 2000; 97(4): 1835 - 1840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
A. L. Hughes, J. da Silva, and R. Friedman
Ancient Genome Duplications Did Not Structure the Human Hox-Bearing Chromosomes
Genome Res., May 1, 2001; 11(5): 771 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.