Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (83)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuzoff, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmer, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuzoff, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmer, E. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 15, 251-263, Copyright © 1998 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The phylogenetic potential of entire 26S rDNA sequences in plants

RK Kuzoff, JA Sweere, DE Soltis, PS Soltis and EA Zimmer
Department of Botany, Washington State University, Pullman 99164-4238, USA. kuzoff@wsunix.wsu.edu

18S ribosomal RNA genes are the most widely used nuclear sequences for phylogeny reconstruction at higher taxonomic levels in plants. However, due to a conservative rate of evolution, 18S rDNA alone sometimes provides too few phylogenetically informative characters to resolve relationships adequately. Previous studies using partial sequences have suggested the potential of 26S or large-subunit (LSU) rDNA for phylogeny retrieval at taxonomic levels comparable to those investigated with 18S rDNA. Here we explore the patterns of molecular evolution of entire 26S rDNA sequences and their impact on phylogeny retrieval. We present a protocol for PCR amplification and sequencing of entire (approximately 3.4 kb) 26S rDNA sequences as single amplicons, as well as primers that can be used for amplification and sequencing. These primers proved useful in angiosperms and Gnetales and likely have broader applicability. With these protocols and primers, entire 26S rDNA sequences were generated for a diverse array of 15 seed plants, including basal eudicots, monocots, and higher eudicots, plus two representatives of Gnetales. Comparisons of sequence dissimilarity indicate that expansion segments (or divergence domains) evolve 6.4 to 10.2 times as fast as conserved core regions of 26S rDNA sequences in plants. Additional comparisons indicate that 26S rDNA evolves 1.6 to 2.2 times as fast as and provides 3.3 times as many phylogenetically informative characters as 18S rDNA; compared to the chloroplast gene rbcL, 26S rDNA evolves at 0.44 to 1.0 times its rate and provides 2.0 times as many phylogenetically informative characters. Expansion segment sequences analyzed here evolve 1.2 to 3.0 times faster than rbcL, providing 1.5 times the number of informative characters. Plant expansion segments have a pattern of evolution distinct from that found in animals, exhibiting less cryptic sequence simplicity, a lower frequency of insertion and deletion, and greater phylogenetic potential.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
K. M. Cameron
On the value of nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences for reconstructing the phylogeny of vanilloid orchids (Vanilloideae, Orchidaceae)
Ann. Bot., August 1, 2009; 104(3): 377 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
D. E. Stage and T. H. Eickbush
Sequence variation within the rRNA gene loci of 12 Drosophila species
Genome Res., December 1, 2007; 17(12): 1888 - 1897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
F. Rutschmann, T. Eriksson, K. A. Salim, and E. Conti
Assessing Calibration Uncertainty in Molecular Dating: The Assignment of Fossils to Alternative Calibration Points
Syst Biol, August 1, 2007; 56(4): 591 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. Rydin, K. R. Pedersen, and E. M. Friis
On the evolutionary history of Ephedra: Cretaceous fossils and extant molecules
PNAS, November 23, 2004; 101(47): 16571 - 16576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. Kim, D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and Y. Suh
DNA sequences from Miocene fossils: an ndhF sequence of Magnolia latahensis (Magnoliaceae) and an rbcL sequence of Persea pseudocarolinensis (Lauraceae)
Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 615 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. Fan and Q.-Y. Xiang
Phylogenetic analyses of Cornales based on 26S rRNA and combined 26S rDNA-MATK-RBCL sequence data
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2003; 90(9): 1357 - 1372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
D. E. Soltis, A. E. Senters, M. J. Zanis, S. Kim, J. D. Thompson, P. S. Soltis, L. P. Ronse De Craene, P. K. Endress, and J. S. Farris
Gunnerales are sister to other core eudicots: implications for the evolution of pentamery
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2003; 90(3): 461 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. N. Muellner, R. Samuel, S. A. Johnson, M. Cheek, T. D. Pennington, and M. W. Chase
Molecular phylogenetics of Meliaceae (Sapindales) based on nuclear and plastid DNA sequences
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2003; 90(3): 471 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
D. L. Nickrent, A. Blarer, Y.-L. Qiu, D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and M. Zanis
Molecular data place Hydnoraceae with Aristolochiaceae
Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2002; 89(11): 1809 - 1817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. R. Omilian and D. J. Taylor
Rate Acceleration and Long-branch Attraction in a Conserved Gene of Cryptic Daphniid (Crustacea) Species
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2001; 18(12): 2201 - 2212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.