Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (47)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hutter, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Aquadro, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hutter, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Aquadro, C. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 15, 1620-1636, Copyright © 1998 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Microsatellite variation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans: a reciprocal test of the ascertainment bias hypothesis

CM Hutter, MD Schug and CF Aquadro
Section of Genetics and Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.

Interspecific comparisons of microsatellite loci have repeatedly shown that the loci are longer and more variable in the species from which they are derived (the focal species) than are homologous loci in other (nonfocal) species. There is debate as to whether this is due to directional evolution or to an ascertainment bias during the cloning and locus selection processes. This study tests these hypotheses by performing a reciprocal study. Eighteen perfect dinucleotide microsatellite loci identified from a Drosophila simulans library screen and 18 previously identified in an identical Drosophila melanogaster library screen were used to survey natural populations of each species. No difference between focal and nonfocal species was observed for mean PCR fragment length. However, heterozygosity and number of alleles were significantly higher in the focal species than in the nonfocal species. The most common allele in the Zimbabwe population of both species was sequenced for 31 of the 36 loci. The length of the longest stretch of perfect repeat units is, on average, longer in the focal species than in the non-focal species. There is a positive correlation between the length of the longest stretch of perfect repeats and heterozygosity. The difference in heterozygosity can thus be explained by a reduction in the length of the longest stretch of perfect repeats in the nonfocal species. Furthermore, flanking-sequence length difference was noted between the two species at 58% of the loci sequenced. These data do not support the predictions of the directional-evolution hypothesis; however, consistent with the ascertainment bias hypothesis, the lower variability in nonfocal species is an artifact of the microsatellite cloning and isolation process. Our results also suggest that the magnitude of ascertainment bias for repeat unit length is a function of the microsatellite size distribution in the genomes of different species.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
C. C. Keever, J. Sunday, C. Wood, M. Byrne, and M. W. Hart
Discovery and Cross-Amplification of Microsatellite Polymorphisms in Asterinid Sea Stars
Biol. Bull., October 1, 2008; 215(2): 164 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
V. Nolte and C. Schlotterer
African Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans Populations Have Similar Levels of Sequence Variability, Suggesting Comparable Effective Population Sizes
Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 405 - 412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. D. Schug, S. G. Smith, A. Tozier-Pearce, and S. F. McEvey
The Genetic Structure of Drosophila ananassae Populations From Asia, Australia and Samoa
Genetics, March 1, 2007; 175(3): 1429 - 1440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
E. J. Vowles and W. Amos
Quantifying Ascertainment Bias and Species-Specific Length Differences in Human and Chimpanzee Microsatellites Using Genome Sequences
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2006; 23(3): 598 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. D. Prasad, M. Muthulakshmi, M. Madhu, S. Archak, K. Mita, and J. Nagaraju
Survey and Analysis of Microsatellites in the Silkworm, Bombyx mori: Frequency, Distribution, Mutations, Marker Potential and Their Conservation in Heterologous Species
Genetics, January 1, 2005; 169(1): 197 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. R. Dettman and J. W. Taylor
Mutation and Evolution of Microsatellite Loci in Neurospora
Genetics, November 1, 2004; 168(3): 1231 - 1248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
G. Schofl and C. Schlotterer
Patterns of Microsatellite Variability Among X Chromosomes and Autosomes Indicate a High Frequency of Beneficial Mutations in Non-African D. simulans
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2004; 21(7): 1384 - 1390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. D. Dean, K. J. Ballard, A. Glass, and J. W. O. Ballard
Influence of Two Wolbachia Strains on Population Structure of East African Drosophila simulans
Genetics, December 1, 2003; 165(4): 1959 - 1969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
Y. Vigouroux, Y. Matsuoka, and J. Doebley
Directional Evolution for Microsatellite Size in Maize
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2003; 20(9): 1480 - 1483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
C. L. Ross, K. A. Dyer, T. Erez, S. J. Miller, J. Jaenike, and T. A. Markow
Rapid Divergence of Microsatellite Abundance Among Species of Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2003; 20(7): 1143 - 1157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
W. Amos, C. M. Hutter, M. D. Schug, and C. F. Aquadro
Directional Evolution of Size Coupled with Ascertainment Bias for Variation in Drosophila Microsatellites
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2003; 20(4): 660 - 662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
P. P. Calabrese, R. T. Durrett, and C. F. Aquadro
Dynamics of Microsatellite Divergence Under Stepwise Mutation and Proportional Slippage/Point Mutation Models
Genetics, October 1, 2001; 159(2): 839 - 852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
K. M. Olsen and B. A. Schaal
Microsatellite variation in cassava (Manihot esculenta, Euphorbiaceae) and its wild relatives: further evidence for a southern Amazonian origin of domestication
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2001; 88(1): 131 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Pascual, M. D. Schug, and C. F. Aquadro
High Density of Long Dinucleotide Microsatellites in Drosophila subobscura
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2000; 17(8): 1259 - 1267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.