Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lenoir, A.
Right arrow Articles by Deragon, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lenoir, A.
Right arrow Articles by Deragon, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 14, 934-941, Copyright © 1997 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Evolution of SINE S1 retroposons in Cruciferae plant species

A Lenoir, B Cournoyer, S Warwick, G Picard and JM Deragon
UMR 6547 CNRS, Universite Blaise Pascal Clermont-Ferrand II, France.

The S1 element is a plant short interspersed element (SINE) that was first described and studied in Brassica napus. In this work, we investigated the distribution and the molecular phylogeny of the S1 element within the Cruciferae (= Brassicaceae). S1 elements were found to be widely distributed within the Cruciferae, especially in species of the tribe Brassiceae. The molecular phylogeny of S1 elements in eight Cruciferae species (Brassica oleracea, Brassica rapa, Brassica napus, Brassica nigra, Sinapis, arvensis, Sinapis pubescens, Coincya monensis, and Vella spinosa) was inferred using 14-36 elements per species. Significant neighbor-joining and maximum-parsimony phylogenetic clusters, supported by high bootstrap P values and/or represented in 100% of the most-parsimonious trees, were observed for each species. Most of these clusters probably correspond to recent species-specific bursts of S1 amplification. Since these species diverged recently, S1 amplification in Cruciferae plants is proposed to be a highly dynamic process that could contribute to genome rearrangements and eventually lead to reproductive isolation. S1 sequence analysis also revealed putative gene conversion events that occurred between different S1 elements of a given species. These events suggest that gene conversion is a minor but significant component of the molecular drive governing S1 concerted evolution.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
V. Cognat, J.-M. Deragon, E. Vinogradova, T. Salinas, C. Remacle, and L. Marechal-Drouard
On the Evolution and Expression of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Nucleus-Encoded Transfer RNA Genes
Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 113 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
T. Pelissier, C. Bousquet-Antonelli, L. Lavie, and J.-M. Deragon
Synthesis and processing of tRNA-related SINE transcripts in Arabidopsis thaliana
Nucleic Acids Res., July 28, 2004; 32(13): 3957 - 3966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
K. Takahashi and N. Okada
Mosaic Structure and Retropositional Dynamics During Evolution of Subfamilies of Short Interspersed Elements in African Cichlids
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2002; 19(8): 1303 - 1312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. Lenoir, L. Lavie, J.-L. Prieto, C. Goubely, J.-C. Cote, T. Pelissier, and J.-M. Deragon
The Evolutionary Origin and Genomic Organization of SINEs in Arabidopsis thaliana
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2001; 18(12): 2315 - 2322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
P. Arnaud, C. Goubely, T. Pélissier, and J.-M. Deragon
SINE Retroposons Can Be Used In Vivo as Nucleation Centers for De Novo Methylation
Mol. Cell. Biol., May 15, 2000; 20(10): 3434 - 3441.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.