Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (45)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhivotovsky, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Grishechkin, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhivotovsky, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Grishechkin, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 14, 926-933, Copyright © 1997 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Biased mutations and microsatellite variation

LA Zhivotovsky, MW Feldman and SA Grishechkin
Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.

Mutation bias is one of the forces that may constrain the variation at microsatellite loci. Here, we study the dynamics of population statistics and the genetic distance between two populations under multiple stepwise mutations with linear bias and random drift. Expressions are derived for these statistics as functions of time, as well as at mutation-drift equilibrium. Applying these expressions to published data on humans and chimpanzees, the regression coefficient of mutation bias on allele size was estimated to be at least between - 0.0064 and -0.013. The assumption of mutational bias produces larger estimates of divergence times than are obtained in its absence; in particular, the time of split between African and non-African human populations is estimated to be between 183,000 and 222,000 years, assuming one-step mutations and no selection. With multistep mutations, the divergence time is estimated to be lower.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. R. Hoelzel, J. Hey, M. E. Dahlheim, C. Nicholson, V. Burkanov, and N. Black
Evolution of Population Structure in a Highly Social Top Predator, the Killer Whale
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2007; 24(6): 1407 - 1415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M.-P. Chapuis and A. Estoup
Microsatellite Null Alleles and Estimation of Population Differentiation
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2007; 24(3): 621 - 631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. Stoltzfus
Mutation-Biased Adaptation in a Protein NK Model
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2006; 23(10): 1852 - 1862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
L. Excoffier, A. Estoup, and J.-M. Cornuet
Bayesian Analysis of an Admixture Model With Mutations and Arbitrarily Linked Markers
Genetics, March 1, 2005; 169(3): 1727 - 1738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
U. Ramakrishnan and J. L. Mountain
Precision and Accuracy of Divergence Time Estimates from STR and SNPSTR Variation
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2004; 21(10): 1960 - 1971.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. Sainudiin, R. T. Durrett, C. F. Aquadro, and R. Nielsen
Microsatellite Mutation Models: Insights From a Comparison of Humans and Chimpanzees
Genetics, September 1, 2004; 168(1): 383 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
O. J. Hardy, N. Charbonnel, H. Freville, and M. Heuertz
Microsatellite Allele Sizes: A Simple Test to Assess Their Significance on Genetic Differentiation
Genetics, April 1, 2003; 163(4): 1467 - 1482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
L. A. Zhivotovsky, D. B. Goldstein, and M. W. Feldman
Genetic Sampling Error of Distance ({delta}{micro})2 and Variation in Mutation Rate Among Microsatellite Loci
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2001; 18(12): 2141 - 2145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
P. P. Calabrese, R. T. Durrett, and C. F. Aquadro
Dynamics of Microsatellite Divergence Under Stepwise Mutation and Proportional Slippage/Point Mutation Models
Genetics, October 1, 2001; 159(2): 839 - 852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Kruglyak, R. Durrett, M. D. Schug, and C. F. Aquadro
Distribution and Abundance of Microsatellites in the Yeast Genome Can Be Explained by a Balance Between Slippage Events and Point Mutations
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2000; 17(8): 1210 - 1219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
Y. Li, T. Fahima, A. B. Korol, J. Peng, M. S. R, V. Kirzhner, A. Beiles, and E. Nevo
Microsatellite Diversity Correlated with Ecological-Edaphic and Genetic Factors in Three Microsites of Wild Emmer Wheat in North Israel
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2000; 17(6): 851 - 862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
L. A. Zhivotovsky, L. Bennett, A. M. Bowcock, and M. W. Feldman
Human Population Expansion and Microsatellite Variation
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2000; 17(5): 757 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
I. Colson and D. B. Goldstein
Evidence for Complex Mutations at Microsatellite Loci in Drosophila
Genetics, June 1, 1999; 152(2): 617 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
E. T. Dermitzakis, A. G. Clark, C. Batargias, A. Magoulas, and E. Zouros
Negative Covariance Suggests Mutation Bias in a Two-Locus Microsatellite System in the Fish Sparus aurata
Genetics, December 1, 1998; 150(4): 1567 - 1575.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.