Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (43)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaut, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Muse, S. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaut, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Muse, S. V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 14, 769-777, Copyright © 1997 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparisons of the molecular evolutionary process at rbcL and ndhF in the grass family (Poaceae)

BS Gaut, LG Clark, JF Wendel and SV Muse
Department of Plant Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, USA. gaut@ahab.rutgers.edu

We examine rate heterogeneity among evolutionary lineages of the grass family at two plasmid loci, ndhF and rbcL, and we introduce a method to determine whether patterns of rate heterogeneity are correlated between loci. We show both that rates of synonymous evolution are heterogeneous among grass lineages and that are heterogeneity is correlated between loci at synonymous sites. At nonsynonymous sites, the pattern of rate heterogeneity is not correlated between loci, primarily due to an aberrant pattern of rate heterogeneity at nonsynonymous sites of rbcL. We compare patterns of synonymous rate heterogeneity to predictors based on the generation time effect and the speciation rate hypotheses. Although there is some evidence for generation time effects, neither generation time effects nor speciation rates appear to be sufficient to explain patterns of rate heterogeneity in the grass plastid sequences.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
S. A. Smith and J. M. Beaulieu
Life history influences rates of climatic niche evolution in flowering plants
Proc R Soc B, December 22, 2009; 276(1677): 4345 - 4352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. F. Soria-Hernanz, J. M. Braverman, and M. B. Hamilton
Parallel Rate Heterogeneity in Chloroplast and Mitochondrial Genomes of Brazil Nut Trees (Lecythidaceae) Is Consistent with Lineage Effects
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2008; 25(7): 1282 - 1296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
E. Schuettpelz and K. M. Pryer
Reconciling Extreme Branch Length Differences: Decoupling Time and Rate through the Evolutionary History of Filmy Ferns
Syst Biol, June 1, 2006; 55(3): 485 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
C.-C. Chang, H.-C. Lin, I-P. Lin, T.-Y. Chow, H.-H. Chen, W.-H. Chen, C.-H. Cheng, C.-Y. Lin, S.-M. Liu, C.-C. Chang, et al.
The Chloroplast Genome of Phalaenopsis aphrodite (Orchidaceae): Comparative Analysis of Evolutionary Rate with that of Grasses and Its Phylogenetic Implications
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2006; 23(2): 279 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
T. J Givnish, J. C. Pires, S. W Graham, M. A McPherson, L. M Prince, T. B Patterson, H. S Rai, E. H Roalson, T. M Evans, W. J Hahn, et al.
Repeated evolution of net venation and fleshy fruits among monocots in shaded habitats confirms a priori predictions: evidence from an ndhF phylogeny
Proc R Soc B, July 22, 2005; 272(1571): 1481 - 1490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
R. J. Morley and C. W. Dick
Missing fossils, molecular clocks, and the origin of the Melastomataceae
Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2003; 90(11): 1638 - 1644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. B. Hamilton, J. M. Braverman, and D. F. Soria-Hernanz
Patterns and Relative Rates of Nucleotide and Insertion/Deletion Evolution at Six Chloroplast Intergenic Regions in New World Species of the Lecythidaceae
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2003; 20(10): 1710 - 1721.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
V. C. Muschner, A. P. Lorenz, A. C. Cervi, S. L. Bonatto, T. T. Souza-Chies, F. M. Salzano, and L. B. Freitas
A first molecular phylogenetic analysis of Passiflora (Passifloraceae)
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2003; 90(8): 1229 - 1238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
H. R. Lascano, L. M. Casano, M. Martin, and B. Sabater
The Activity of the Chloroplastic Ndh Complex Is Regulated by Phosphorylation of the NDH-F Subunit
Plant Physiology, May 1, 2003; 132(1): 256 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
K. Andreasen and B. G. Baldwin
Unequal Evolutionary Rates Between Annual and Perennial Lineages of Checker Mallows (Sidalcea, Malvaceae): Evidence from 18S-26S rDNA Internal and External Transcribed Spacers
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2001; 18(6): 936 - 944.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A.-K. Ainouche and R. J. Bayer
Phylogenetic relationships in Lupinus (Fabaceae: Papilionoideae) based on internal transcribed spacer sequences (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA
Am. J. Botany, April 1, 1999; 86(4): 590 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. Schnabel and J. F. Wendel
Cladistic biogeography of Gleditsia (Leguminosae) based on ndhF and rpl16 chloroplast gene sequences
Am. J. Botany, December 1, 1998; 85(12): 1753 - 1765.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.