Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamblin, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Aquadro, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamblin, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Aquadro, C. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 13, 1133-1140, Copyright © 1996 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

High nucleotide sequence variation in a region of low recombination in Drosophila simulans is consistent with the background selection model

MT Hamblin and CF Aquadro
Section of Genetics and Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA. mth3@cornell.edu

We surveyed nucleotide sequence variation at glucose dehydrogenase (Gld), in a region of low recombination on chromosome 3R, from a population sample of Drosophila simulans. The levels of nucleotide variation were surprisingly high. There was no departure from the expectation of a neutral model for the level of polymorphism, indicating no evidence of a selective sweep in this region. There was a significant deficiency of singleton polymorphisms according to the Fu and Li test, although Tajima and Hudson, Kreitman, and Aguade (HKA) tests do not provide evidence of a significant elevation of variation due to balancing selection. Genetic map data for the D. simulans third chromosome were used to calculate expected values of pi for Gld under a current model of background selection, varying the values for the parameter sh (selection coefficient against deleterious mutations). We show that the recombinational landscape of D. simulans is sufficiently different from that of D. melanogaster that we expect higher variation under the background selection model, even when effective population sizes are assumed to be equal. The data for Gld were tested against the predictions using computer simulations of the distribution of the number of segregating sites conditioned on pi. Background selection alone can explain our observations as long as sh is larger than 0.005 and species-level effective population size is assumed to be several- fold larger than in D. melanogaster. Alternatively, the deleterious mutation rate may be smaller in D. simulans, or balancing selection may be acting nearby, thereby reducing the effect of background selection.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. D. Singh, A. M. Larracuente, and A. G. Clark
Contrasting the Efficacy of Selection on the X and Autosomes in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 454 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. De and R. Durrett
Stepping-Stone Spatial Structure Causes Slow Decay of Linkage Disequilibrium and Shifts the Site Frequency Spectrum
Genetics, June 1, 2007; 176(2): 969 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
V. L. Bauer DuMont, H. A. Flores, M. H. Wright, and C. F. Aquadro
Recurrent Positive Selection at Bgcn, a Key Determinant of Germ Line Differentiation, Does Not Appear to be Driven by Simple Coevolution with Its Partner Protein Bam
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 182 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
F. A. Reed, J. M. Akey, and C. F. Aquadro
Fitting background-selection predictions to levels of nucleotide variation and divergence along the human autosomes
Genome Res., September 1, 2005; 15(9): 1211 - 1221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
E. Santiago and A. Caballero
Variation After a Selective Sweep in a Subdivided Population
Genetics, January 1, 2005; 169(1): 475 - 483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
V. B. DuMont, J. C. Fay, P. P. Calabrese, and C. F. Aquadro
DNA Variability and Divergence at the Notch Locus in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: A Case of Accelerated Synonymous Site Divergence
Genetics, May 1, 2004; 167(1): 171 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. D. Dean, K. J. Ballard, A. Glass, and J. W. O. Ballard
Influence of Two Wolbachia Strains on Population Structure of East African Drosophila simulans
Genetics, December 1, 2003; 165(4): 1959 - 1969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. Parsch, C. D. Meiklejohn, and D. L. Hartl
Patterns of DNA Sequence Variation Suggest the Recent Action of Positive Selection in the janus-ocnus Region of Drosophila simulans
Genetics, October 1, 2001; 159(2): 647 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
P. Andolfatto
Contrasting Patterns of X-Linked and Autosomal Nucleotide Variation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2001; 18(3): 279 - 290.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Przeworski, J. D. Wall, and P. Andolfatto
Recombination and the Frequency Spectrum in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2001; 18(3): 291 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
P. Andolfatto and M. Przeworski
A Genome-Wide Departure From the Standard Neutral Model in Natural Populations of Drosophila
Genetics, September 1, 2000; 156(1): 257 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. M. Weinreich and D. M. Rand
Contrasting Patterns of Nonneutral Evolution in Proteins Encoded in Nuclear and Mitochondrial Genomes
Genetics, September 1, 2000; 156(1): 385 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. J. Begun and P. Whitley
Reduced X-linked nucleotide polymorphism in Drosophila simulans
PNAS, May 23, 2000; 97(11): 5960 - 5965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
P. Andolfatto and M. Kreitman
Molecular Variation at the In(2L)t Proximal Breakpoint Site in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans
Genetics, April 1, 2000; 154(4): 1681 - 1691.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. J. Schmid, L. Nigro, C. F. Aquadro, and D. Tautz
Large Number of Replacement Polymorphisms in Rapidly Evolving Genes of Drosophila: Implications for Genome-Wide Surveys of DNA Polymorphism
Genetics, December 1, 1999; 153(4): 1717 - 1729.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. T. Hamblin and C. F. Aquadro
DNA Sequence Variation and the Recombinational Landscape in Drosophila pseudoobscura: A Study of the Second Chromosome
Genetics, October 1, 1999; 153(2): 859 - 869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. T. Hamblin and M. Veuille
Population Structure Among African and Derived Populations of Drosophila simulans: Evidence for Ancient Subdivision and Recent Admixture
Genetics, September 1, 1999; 153(1): 305 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
E. Santiago and A. Caballero
Effective Size and Polymorphism of Linked Neutral Loci in Populations Under Directional Selection
Genetics, August 1, 1998; 149(4): 2105 - 2117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
T. S. Takano
Rate Variation of DNA Sequence Evolution in the Drosophila Lineages
Genetics, June 1, 1998; 149(2): 959 - 970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.