Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (137)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Russo, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nei, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Russo, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nei, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 13, 525-536, Copyright © 1996 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny

CA Russo, N Takezaki and M Nei
Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802, USA.

The relative efficiencies of different protein-coding genes of the mitochondrial genome and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny (two whale species, cow, rat, mouse, opossum, chicken, frog, and three bony fish species) was evaluated. The tree-building methods examined were the neighbor joining (NJ), minimum evolution (ME), maximum parsimony (MP), and maximum likelihood (ML), and both nucleotide sequences and deduced amino acid sequences were analyzed. Generally speaking, amino acid sequences were better than nucleotide sequences in obtaining the true tree (topology) or trees close to the true tree. However, when only first and second codon positions data were used, nucleotide sequences produced reasonably good trees. Among the 13 genes examined, Nd5 produced the true tree in all tree-building methods or algorithms for both amino acid and nucleotide sequence data. Genes Cytb and Nd4 also produced the correct tree in most tree-building algorithms when amino acid sequence data were used. By contrast, Co2, Nd1, and Nd41 showed a poor performance. In general, large genes produced better results, and when the entire set of genes was used, all tree-building methods generated the true tree. In each tree-building method, several distance measures or algorithms were used, but all these distance measures or algorithms produced essentially the same results. The ME method, in which many different topologies are examined, was no better than the NJ method, which generates a single final tree. Similarly, an ML method, in which many topologies are examined, was no better than the ML star decomposition algorithm that generates a single final tree. In ML the best substitution model chosen by using the Akaike information criterion produced no better results than simpler substitution models. These results question the utility of the currently used optimization principles in phylogenetic construction. Relatively simple methods such as the NJ and ML star decomposition algorithms seem to produce as good results as those obtained by more sophisticated methods. The efficiencies of the NJ, ME, MP, and ML methods in obtaining the correct tree were nearly the same when amino acid sequence data were used. The most important factor in constructing reliable phylogenetic trees seems to be the number of amino acids or nucleotides used.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
D. San Mauro, D. J. Gower, T. Massingham, M. Wilkinson, R. Zardoya, and J. A. Cotton
Experimental Design in Caecilian Systematics: Phylogenetic Information of Mitochondrial Genomes and Nuclear rag1
Syst Biol, August 18, 2009; (2009) syp043v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
J. Kim, J. J. Smith, L. Tian, and D. DellaPenna
The Evolution and Function of Carotenoid Hydroxylases in Arabidopsis
Plant Cell Physiol., March 1, 2009; 50(3): 463 - 479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
Z. Lin, M. Nei, and H. Ma
The origins and early evolution of DNA mismatch repair genes multiple horizontal gene transfers and co-evolution
Nucleic Acids Res., December 3, 2007; 35(22): 7591 - 7603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
R. E. Broughton and P. C. Reneau
Spatial Covariation of Mutation and Nonsynonymous Substitution Rates in Vertebrate Mitochondrial Genomes
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2006; 23(8): 1516 - 1524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
R. L. Mueller
Evolutionary Rates, Divergence Dates, and the Performance of Mitochondrial Genes in Bayesian Phylogenetic Analysis
Syst Biol, April 1, 2006; 55(2): 289 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
V. Hollich, L. Milchert, L. Arvestad, and E. L. L. Sonnhammer
Assessment of Protein Distance Measures and Tree-Building Methods for Phylogenetic Tree Reconstruction
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2005; 22(11): 2257 - 2264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
F. Ren, H. Tanaka, and Z. Yang
An Empirical Examination of the Utility of Codon-Substitution Models in Phylogeny Reconstruction
Syst Biol, October 1, 2005; 54(5): 808 - 818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. J. Baker, L. J. Huynen, O. Haddrath, C. D. Millar, and D. M. Lambert
Reconstructing the tempo and mode of evolution in an extinct clade of birds with ancient DNA: The giant moas of New Zealand
PNAS, June 7, 2005; 102(23): 8257 - 8262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
A. T. R. de Vasconcelos, A. C. R. Guimaraes, C. H. M. Castelletti, C. S. Caruso, C. Ribeiro, F. Yokaichiya, G. R. G. Armoa, G. d. S. P. Pereira, I. T. da Silva, C. G. Schrago, et al.
MamMiBase: a mitochondrial genome database for mammalian phylogenetic studies
Bioinformatics, May 15, 2005; 21(10): 2566 - 2567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
T. Nishiyama, P. G. Wolf, M. Kugita, R. B. Sinclair, M. Sugita, C. Sugiura, T. Wakasugi, K. Yamada, K. Yoshinaga, K. Yamaguchi, et al.
Chloroplast Phylogeny Indicates that Bryophytes Are Monophyletic
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2004; 21(10): 1813 - 1819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
C. G. Schrago and C. A. M. Russo
Timing the Origin of New World Monkeys
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2003; 20(10): 1620 - 1625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. Nam, C. W. dePamphilis, H. Ma, and M. Nei
Antiquity and Evolution of the MADS-Box Gene Family Controlling Flower Development in Plants
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2003; 20(9): 1435 - 1447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. L. Hughes and R. Friedman
Genome-Wide Survey for Genes Horizontally Transferred from Cellular Organisms to Baculoviruses
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2003; 20(6): 979 - 987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Doiron, L. Bernatchez, and P. U. Blier
A Comparative Mitogenomic Analysis of the Potential Adaptive Value of Arctic Charr mtDNA Introgression in Brook Charr Populations (Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill)
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2002; 19(11): 1902 - 1909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
C. Grande, J. Templado, J. Lucas Cervera, and R. Zardoya
The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of the Nudibranch Roboastra europaea (Mollusca: Gastropoda) Supports the Monophyly of Opisthobranchs
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2002; 19(10): 1672 - 1685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
T. R. Buckley and C. W. Cunningham
The Effects of Nucleotide Substitution Model Assumptions on Estimates of Nonparametric Bootstrap Support
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2002; 19(4): 394 - 405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
I. Delisle and C. Strobeck
Conserved Primers for Rapid Sequencing of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome from Carnivores, Applied to Three Species of Bears
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2002; 19(3): 357 - 361.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
E. Haring, L. Kruckenhauser, A. Gamauf, M. J. Riesing, and W. Pinsker
The Complete Sequence of the Mitochondrial Genome of Buteo buteo (Aves, Accipitridae) Indicates an Early Split in the Phylogeny of Raptors
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2001; 18(10): 1892 - 1904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Zardoya and A. Meyer
On the origin of and phylogenetic relationships among living amphibians
PNAS, May 30, 2001; (2001) 111455498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. Posada and K. A. Crandall
Simple (Wrong) Models for Complex Trees: A Case from Retroviridae
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2001; 18(2): 271 - 275.
[Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Ludwig, B. May, L. Debus, and I. Jenneckens
Heteroplasmy in the mtDNA Control Region of Sturgeon (Acipenser, Huso and Scaphirhynchus)
Genetics, December 1, 2000; 156(4): 1933 - 1947.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. Zardoya and A. Meyer
Mitochondrial Evidence on the Phylogenetic Position of Caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona)
Genetics, June 1, 2000; 155(2): 765 - 775.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
B. Goffinet, R. J. Bayer, and D. H. Vitt
Circumscription and phylogeny of the Orthotrichales (Bryopsida) inferred from RBCL sequence analyses
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 1998; 85(9): 1324 - 1337.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Zardoya and A. Meyer
On the origin of and phylogenetic relationships among living amphibians
PNAS, June 19, 2001; 98(13): 7380 - 7383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.