Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (171)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Estoup, A.
Right arrow Articles by Solignac, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Estoup, A.
Right arrow Articles by Solignac, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 12, 1074-1084, Copyright © 1995 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Size homoplasy and mutational processes of interrupted microsatellites in two bee species, Apis mellifera and Bombus terrestris (Apidae)

A Estoup, C Tailliez, JM Cornuet and M Solignac
Laboratoire Populations, Genetique et Evolution, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Similar microsatellite electromorphs (PCR products of the same size) can arise from independent mutational events. Such alleles are not identical by descent. This phenomenon, termed size homoplasy, was studied by sequencing electromorphs of two microsatellite loci in which the stretch of basic repeats is interrupted by different short (1-2 bp) DNA motifs. The number and position of these interruptions were established for electromorphs from closely and distantly related populations of honeybees and bumblebees. No sequence difference was found when electromorphs came from the same subspecies or from closely related subspecies, suggesting that they were probably identical by descent. In contrast, sequence differences were often detected in distantly related subspecies, showing that size homoplasy frequently occurs at this level of population differentiation. Size homoplasy is increased by limits to free length variation of alleles, a phenomenon that seems to act on interrupted microsatellites when comparing distantly related taxa, that is, honeybee subspecies from different evolutionary lineages. Electromorph sequences suggest that, within the scope of these limits, large mutation events have occurred frequently at both interrupted loci studied. In good agreement with the molecular data, computations based on the observed heterozygosity and number of electromorphs and simulation studies showed that neither locus fits the one-step stepwise mutant model (SMM). We speculate that interrupted microsatellites in general could be characterized by a higher variance in repeat number and consequently a lower homoplasy rate than pure ones. Hence, interrupted microsatellites should be most appropriate for investigating population differentiation and evolutionary relationship between relatively distant populations.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J HeredHome page
E. D. Lorenzen, P. Arctander, and H. R. Siegismund
Regional Genetic Structuring and Evolutionary History of the Impala Aepyceros melampus
J. Hered., March 1, 2006; 97(2): 119 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. Ciofi, G. A. Wilson, L. B. Beheregaray, C. Marquez, J. P. Gibbs, W. Tapia, H. L. Snell, A. Caccone, and J. R. Powell
Phylogeographic History and Gene Flow Among Giant Galapagos Tortoises on Southern Isabela Island
Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1727 - 1744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. R. Dettman and J. W. Taylor
Mutation and Evolution of Microsatellite Loci in Neurospora
Genetics, November 1, 2004; 168(3): 1231 - 1248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
Z.-Y. Shao, H.-X. Mao, W.-J. Fu, M. Ono, D.-S. Wang, M. Bonizzoni, and Y.-P. Zhang
Genetic Structure of Asian Populations of Bombus ignitus (Hymenoptera: Apidae)
J. Hered., January 1, 2004; 95(1): 46 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
O. P. BRAGINETS, N. MINAKAWA, C. M. MBOGO, and G. YAN
POPULATION GENETIC STRUCTURE OF THE AFRICAN MALARIA MOSQUITO ANOPHELES FUNESTUS IN KENYA
Am J Trop Med Hyg, September 1, 2003; 69(3): 303 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. M. Blankenship, B. May, and D. Hedgecock
Evolution of a Perfect Simple Sequence Repeat Locus in the Context of Its Flanking Sequence
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2002; 19(11): 1943 - 1951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
P.-A. Landry, M. T. Koskinen, and C. R. Primmer
Deriving Evolutionary Relationships Among Populations Using Microsatellites and ({delta}{micro})2: All Loci Are Equal, but Some Are More Equal Than Others ...
Genetics, July 1, 2002; 161(3): 1339 - 1347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
H. D. Marshall, C. Newton, and K. Ritland
Sequence-Repeat Polymorphisms Exhibit the Signature of Recombination in Lodgepole Pine Chloroplast DNA
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2001; 18(11): 2136 - 2138.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Culver, M. A. Menotti-Raymond, and S. J. O'Brien
Patterns of Size Homoplasy at 10 Microsatellite Loci in Pumas (Puma concolor)
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2001; 18(6): 1151 - 1156.
[Full Text]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Pascual, C. F. Aquadro, V. Soto, and L. Serra
Microsatellite Variation in Colonizing and Palearctic Populations of Drosophila subobscura
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2001; 18(5): 731 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
B. Angers, A. Estoup, and P. Jarne
Microsatellite Size Homoplasy, SSCP, and Population Structure: A Case Study in the Freshwater Snail Bulinus truncatus
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2000; 17(12): 1926 - 1932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
B. Harr, B. Zangerl, and C. Schlotterer
Removal of Microsatellite Interruptions by DNA Replication Slippage: Phylogenetic Evidence from Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2000; 17(7): 1001 - 1009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Reza Shariflou and C. Moran
Conservation Within Artiodactyls of an AATA Interrupt in the IGF-I Microsatellite for 19-35 Million Years
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2000; 17(4): 665 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
L. N. Bull, C. R. Pabón-Peña, and N. B. Freimer
Compound Microsatellite Repeats: Practical and Theoretical Features
Genome Res., September 1, 1999; 9(9): 830 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
C. L. Davis, D. Field, D. Metzgar, R. Saiz, P. A. Morin, I. L. Smith, S. A. Spector, and C. Wills
Numerous Length Polymorphisms at Short Tandem Repeats in Human Cytomegalovirus
J. Virol., August 1, 1999; 73(8): 6265 - 6270.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. G. Jones, G. Rosenqvist, A. Berglund, and J. C. Avise
Clustered Microsatellite Mutations in the Pipefish Syngnathus typhle
Genetics, July 1, 1999; 152(3): 1057 - 1063.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
P. J. Palsbøll, M. Bérubé, and H. Jørgensen
Multiple Levels of Single-Strand Slippage at Cetacean Tri- and Tetranucleotide Repeat Microsatellite Loci
Genetics, January 1, 1999; 151(1): 285 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. Orti, D. E. Pearse, and J. C. Avise
Phylogenetic assessment of length variation at a microsatellite locus
PNAS, September 30, 1997; 94(20): 10745 - 10749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
J C Garza and N B Freimer
Homoplasy for size at microsatellite loci in humans and chimpanzees.
Genome Res., March 1, 1996; 6(3): 211 - 217.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.