Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (150)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hay, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Maxson, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hay, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Maxson, L. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 12, 928-937, Copyright © 1995 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Phylogenetic relationships of amphibian families inferred from DNA sequences of mitochondrial 12S and 16S ribosomal RNA genes

JM Hay, I Ruvinsky, SB Hedges and LR Maxson
Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802, USA.

Nucleotide sequence comparisons were used to investigate ordinal and familial relationships within the class Amphibia. Approximately 850 base pairs of the mitochondrial 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene from representatives of 28 of the 40 families of extant amphibians were sequenced. Phylogenetic analyses of these data together with published data of the 12S rRNA gene for the same families and both genes for three more taxa (approximately 1,300 base pairs total for 35 taxa) support the monophyly of each of the three amphibian orders: Anura (confidence value with the interior-branch test: P(c) = 99%), Caudata (P(c) = 100%), and Gymnophiona (P(c) = 99%). An analysis using the four- cluster method cannot discriminate significantly between all three possible unrooted trees involving the three orders of amphibians and an outgroup. Within the Anura, there is support for the monophyly of the two suborders: Neobatrachia (P(c) = 100%) and Archaeobatrachia (P(c) = 97%); the latter was believed to be paraphyletic on the basis of morphology. Within the Archaeobatrachia, the following pairs of taxa cluster: Pelobatidae + Pelodytidae (P(c) = 99%), Pipidae + Rhinophrynidae (P(c) = 99%), Ascaphus + Leiopelmatidae (P(c) = 89%), and Bombina + Discoglossidae (P(c) = 99%). The latter six taxa cluster (P(c) = 94%) such that Pelobatidae + Pelodytidae forms a basal lineage within the Archaeobatrachia. Three major lineages are distinguished within the Neobatrachia: the superfamily Bufonoidea sensu Duellman (P(c) = 86%), the superfamily Ranoidea sensu Lynch (P(c) = 99%), and the Sooglossidae. Basal within the Bufonoidea, Myobatrachidae + Heleophrynidae cluster at P(c) = 96%. The enigmatic Dendrobatidae clusters with the bufonoid families (P(c) = 92%) and is excluded from the ranoid families (P(c) = 99%). (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
N. B. Frobisch and R. R. Schoch
Testing the Impact of Miniaturization on Phylogeny: Paleozoic Dissorophoid Amphibians
Syst Biol, July 3, 2009; (2009) syp029v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
D. Marjanovic and M. Laurin
Fossils, Molecules, Divergence Times, and the Origin of Lissamphibians
Syst Biol, June 1, 2007; 56(3): 369 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
C. Poux, O. Madsen, E. Marquard, D. R. Vieites, W. W. de Jong, and M. Vences
Asynchronous Colonization of Madagascar by the Four Endemic Clades of Primates, Tenrecs, Carnivores, and Rodents as Inferred from Nuclear Genes
Syst Biol, October 1, 2005; 54(5): 719 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
D. W. Weisrock, L. J. Harmon, and A. Larson
Resolving Deep Phylogenetic Relationships in Salamanders: Analyses of Mitochondrial and Nuclear Genomic Data
Syst Biol, October 1, 2005; 54(5): 758 - 777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
P. Zhang, H. Zhou, Y.-Q. Chen, Y.-F. Liu, and L.-H. Qu
Mitogenomic Perspectives on the Origin and Phylogeny of Living Amphibians
Syst Biol, June 1, 2005; 54(3): 391 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
J. J. Wiens, R. M. Bonett, and P. T. Chippindale
Ontogeny Discombobulates Phylogeny: Paedomorphosis and Higher-Level Salamander Relationships
Syst Biol, February 1, 2005; 54(1): 91 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
K. Roelants and F. Bossuyt
Archaeobatrachian Paraphyly and Pangaean Diversification of Crown-Group Frogs
Syst Biol, February 1, 2005; 54(1): 111 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
The evolution of long bone microstructure and lifestyle in lissamphibians
Paleobiology, December 1, 2004; 30(4): 589 - 613.



Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Hoegg, M. Vences, H. Brinkmann, and A. Meyer
Phylogeny and Comparative Substitution Rates of Frogs Inferred from Sequences of Three Nuclear Genes
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2004; 21(7): 1188 - 1200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
B. Waldman and P. J. Bishop
Chemical communication in an archaic anuran amphibian
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2004; 15(1): 88 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
A. M. Maglia, L. A. Pugener, and L. Trueb
Comparative Development of Anurans: Using Phylogeny to Understand Ontogeny
Integr. Comp. Biol., June 1, 2001; 41(3): 538 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Zardoya and A. Meyer
On the origin of and phylogenetic relationships among living amphibians
PNAS, May 30, 2001; (2001) 111455498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Zardoya and A. Meyer
On the origin of and phylogenetic relationships among living amphibians
PNAS, June 19, 2001; 98(13): 7380 - 7383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.