Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pesole, G.
Right arrow Articles by Saccone, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pesole, G.
Right arrow Articles by Saccone, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 12, 189-197, Copyright © 1995 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Glutamine synthetase gene evolution in bacteria

G Pesole, C Gissi, C Lanave and C Saccone
Dipartimento di Biochimica e Biologia Molecolare, Universita di Bari, Italy.

The evolution of the prokaryotic glutamine synthase (GS) genes, namely the GSI and GSII isoforms, has been investigated using the second codon positions, which have previously proven to behave as a good molecular clock. Our data confirm the early divergence between prokaryotic and eukaryotic GSII before the splitting between plants and animals. The phylogenetic tree of the GSI isoforms shows Archaebacteria to be more closely related to Eubacteria than to Eukaryotes. This finding is confirmed by the phylogenetic analysis carried out on both large and small subunits of rRNA. However, differently from the rRNA analyses, Crenarchaeota and Euryarchaeota Archaebacteria, as well as high- and low-GC gram-positive bacteria, appear to be polyphyletic. We provide evidence that the observed polyphyly of Archaebacteria might be only apparent, resulting from a gene duplication event preceding the split between Archaebacteria and Eubacteria and followed by the retention of only one isoform in the extant lineages. Both gram-negative bacteria and high-GC gram-positive bacteria, which appear closely related, have GS activity regulated by an adenylylation/deadenylylation mechanism. A lateral gene transfer from Archaebacteria to low-GC eubacteria is invoked to explain the observed polyphyly of gram-positive bacteria.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
J. Raymond
The Evolution of Biological Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling--a Genomic Perspective
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2005; 59(1): 211 - 231.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 MicrobiologyHome page
P. Cabello, M. D. Roldan, and C. Moreno-Vivian
Nitrate reduction and the nitrogen cycle in archaea
Microbiology, November 1, 2004; 150(11): 3527 - 3546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. P. Gogarten, W. F. Doolittle, and J. G. Lawrence
Prokaryotic Evolution in Light of Gene Transfer
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2002; 19(12): 2226 - 2238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. L. Turner and J. P. W. Young
The Glutamine Synthetases of Rhizobia: Phylogenetics and Evolutionary Implications
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2000; 17(2): 309 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.