Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (50)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, D.
Right arrow Articles by Moritz, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, D.
Right arrow Articles by Moritz, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 11, 672-683, Copyright © 1994 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Sequence evolution and phylogenetic signal in control-region and cytochrome b sequences of rainbow fishes (Melanotaeniidae)

D Zhu, BG Jamieson, A Hugall and C Moritz
Department of Zoology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

The nucleotide sequences of segments of the cytochrome b gene (351 bp), the tRNA(Pro) gene (49 bp), and the control region (approximately 313 bp) of mitochondrial DNA were obtained from 26 fish representing different populations and species of Melanotaenia and one species of Glossolepis, freshwater rainbow fishes confined to Australia and New Guinea. The purpose was to investigate relative rates and patterns of sequence evolution. Overall levels of divergence were similar for the cytochrome b and tRNA control-region sequences, both ranging from < 1% within subspecies to 15%-19% between genera. However, the patterns of sequence evolution differed. For the cytochrome b gene, transitions consistently exceeded transversions, the bias ranging from 4.2:1 to 2:1, depending on the level of sequence divergence. However, in the control-region sequence, a bias toward transitions (2:1) was observed only in comparisons between very similar sequences, and transversions outnumbered transitions in comparisons of divergent sequences. Graphic comparisons suggested that the control region was saturated for transitions at relatively low levels of sequence divergence but accumulated transversions at a greater rate than did the cytochrome b sequence. These distinct patterns of base substitution are associated with differences in A+T content, which is 70% for the tRNA control- region segment versus 50% for cytochrome b. A test for skewness in the distribution of lengths of random trees indicated that both segments contained phylogenetic signal. Parsimony analyses of the data from the two regions, with or without weighting schemes appropriate to the respective patterns of sequence evolution, identified the same five groupings of sequences, but the relationships among the groups differed. However, in most cases the branches uniting different combinations of groups were poorly supported, and the differences among topologies were insignificant. Considering the observed patterns of base substitution and the results of the phylogenetic analyses, we deduce that both the control region and cytochrome b are appropriate for population genetic studies but that the control region is less effective than cytochrome b for resolving relationships among divergent lineages of rainbow fishes.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J HeredHome page
B. W. Bowen, A. Muss, L. A. Rocha, and W. S. Grant
Shallow mtDNA Coalescence in Atlantic Pygmy Angelfishes (Genus Centropyge) Indicates a Recent Invasion from the Indian Ocean
J. Hered., January 1, 2006; 97(1): 1 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.