Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eyre-Walker, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eyre-Walker, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 11, 88-98, Copyright © 1994 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

DNA mismatch repair and synonymous codon evolution in mammals

A Eyre-Walker
Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh.

It has been suggested that the differences in synonymous codon use between mammalian genes within a genome are due to differences in the efficiency of DNA mismatch repair. This hypothesis was tested by developing a model of mismatch repair, which was used to predict the expected relationship between the rate of substitution and G+C content at silent sites. It was found that the silent-substitution rate should decline with increasing G+C content over most of the G+C-content range, if it is assumed that mismatch repair is G+C biased, an assumption which is supported by data. This prediction was then tested on a set of 58 primate and artiodactyl genes. There was no evidence of a direct decline in substitution rate with increasing G+C content, for either twofold- or fourfold-degenerate sites. It was therefore concluded that variation in the efficiency of mismatch repair is not responsible for the differences in synonymous codon use between mammalian genes. In support of this conclusion, analysis of the model also showed that the parameter range over which mismatch repair can explain the differences in synonymous codon use between genes is very small.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. A. Filatov and D. Charlesworth
Substitution Rates in the X- and Y-Linked Genes of the Plants, Silene latifolia and S. dioica
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2002; 19(6): 898 - 907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. E. Vinogradov
Bendable Genes of Warm-blooded Vertebrates
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2001; 18(12): 2195 - 2200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. P. Bielawski, K. A. Dunn, and Z. Yang
Rates of Nucleotide Substitution and Mammalian Nuclear Gene Evolution: Approximate and Maximum-Likelihood Methods Lead to Different Conclusions
Genetics, November 1, 2000; 156(3): 1299 - 1308.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
K. J. Fryxell and E. Zuckerkandl
Cytosine Deamination Plays a Primary Role in the Evolution of Mammalian Isochores
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2000; 17(9): 1371 - 1383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Llopart and M. Aguadé
Nucleotide Polymorphism at the RpII215 Gene in Drosophila subobscura: Weak Selection on Synonymous Mutations
Genetics, July 1, 2000; 155(3): 1245 - 1252.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Eyre-Walker
Evidence of Selection on Silent Site Base Composition in Mammals: Potential Implications for the Evolution of Isochores and Junk DNA
Genetics, June 1, 1999; 152(2): 675 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.