Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (262)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eernisse, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kluge, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eernisse, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kluge, A. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 10, 1170-1195, Copyright © 1993 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules, and morphology

DJ Eernisse and AG Kluge
Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-1079.

Taxonomic congruence and total evidence are competing paradigms in phylogenetic inference. Taxonomic congruence focuses on deriving a consensus from the results obtained from separately analyzed data sets, whereas total evidence uses character congruence in the search for the best-fitting hypothesis for all of the available character evidence. Explicit or implicit use of taxonomic congruence is usually employed when an investigator either has both molecular and morphological data sets or has different gene-, rRNA-, or protein-sequence data sets available. Indeed, a taxonomic congruence rationale is frequently used as the basis for exploring classes of data, thus allowing comparison between the phylogenetic signal emerging from a particular data set and those of other such classes. Problematic aspects of employing the taxonomic congruence approach include the potentially misleading and arbitrary choices of both a consensus method and the division of characters into subsets. If the goal of an analysis is to provide the best estimate of genealogy afforded by the available character evidence, then taxonomic congruence is substantially more arbitrary than a total evidence approach. The theoretical advantages of phylogenetic estimates based on total evidence are argued in the present study and are illustrated with an example of amniote relationships. We report conflicting results from total evidence and taxonomic congruence approaches, with analyses of previously reported data from both fossil and living amniotes and from both morphology and molecules, the latter including available 18S rRNA, 28S rRNA, and protein sequences. We conclude that a more highly resolved and robust phylogenetic hypothesis of amniotes, the traditional one, emerges when a total evidence approach is employed.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
C. Figueroa, G. A. Salazar, H. A. Zavaleta, and E. M. Engleman
Root Character Evolution and Systematics in Cranichidinae, Prescottiinae and Spiranthinae (Orchidaceae, Cranichideae)
Ann. Bot., March 1, 2008; 101(4): 509 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. A. Mori, C.-H. Tsou, C.-C. Wu, B. Cronholm, and A. A. Anderberg
Evolution of Lecythidaceae with an emphasis on the circumscription of neotropical genera: information from combined ndhF and trnL-F sequence data
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2007; 94(3): 289 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
K. H. Chu, C. P. Li, and J. Qi
Ribosomal RNA as molecular barcodes: a simple correlation analysis without sequence alignment
Bioinformatics, July 15, 2006; 22(14): 1690 - 1701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
M. E. Mermoz and J. F. Ornelas
Phylogenetic analysis of life-history adaptations in parasitic cowbirds
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2004; 15(1): 109 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Creer, A. Malhotra, and R. S. Thorpe
Assessing the Phylogenetic Utility of Four Mitochondrial Genes and a Nuclear Intron in the Asian Pit Viper Genus, Trimeresurus: Separate, Simultaneous, and Conditional Data Combination Analyses
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2003; 20(8): 1240 - 1251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. W. CHASE, S. KNAPP, A. V. COX, J. J. CLARKSON, Y. BUTSKO, J. JOSEPH, V. SAVOLAINEN, and A. S. PAROKONNY
Molecular Systematics, GISH and the Origin of Hybrid Taxa in Nicotiana (Solanaceae)
Ann. Bot., July 1, 2003; 92(1): 107 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
V. Daubin, M. Gouy, and G. Perriere
A Phylogenomic Approach to Bacterial Phylogeny: Evidence of a Core of Genes Sharing a Common History
Genome Res., July 1, 2002; 12(7): 1080 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. A. Anderberg, C. Rydin, and M. Kallersjo
Phylogenetic relationships in the order Ericales s.l.: analyses of molecular data from five genes from the plastid and mitochondrial genomes
Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2002; 89(4): 677 - 687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. Fan
Phylogenetic relationships within Cornus (Cornaceae) based on 26S rDNA sequences
Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2001; 88(6): 1131 - 1138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
D. E. Soltis, M. Tago-Nakazawa, Q.-Y. Xiang, S. Kawano, J. Murata, M. Wakabayashi, and C. Hibsch-Jetter
Phylogenetic relationships and evolution in Chrysosplenium (Saxifragaceae) based on matK sequence data
Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2001; 88(5): 883 - 893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of PaleontologyHome page
B. E. BODENBENDER and D. C. FISHER
STRATOCLADISTIC ANALYSIS OF BLASTOID PHYLOGENY
Journal of Paleontology, March 1, 2001; 75(2): 351 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
M. Backlund, B. Oxelman, and B. Bremer
Phylogenetic relationships within the Gentianales based on NDHF and RBCL sequences, with particular reference to the Loganiaceae
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2000; 87(7): 1029 - 1043.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. P. Simmons, C. Donovan Bailey, and K. C. Nixon
Phylogeny Reconstruction Using Duplicate Genes
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2000; 17(4): 469 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
The muricid gastropod subfamily Rapaninae: phylogeny and ecological history
Paleobiology, March 1, 2000; 26(1): 19 - 46.



Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
T. M. Hardig, P. S. Soltis, and D. E. Soltis
Diversification of the North American shrub genus Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae): conflicting phylogenies from nuclear ribosomal DNA and chloroplast DNA
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2000; 87(1): 108 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Zardoya and A. Meyer
Complete mitochondrial genome suggests diapsid affinities of turtles
PNAS, November 24, 1998; 95(24): 14226 - 14231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
F. Hallbook, L.-G. Lundin, and K. Kullander
Lampetra fluviatilis Neurotrophin Homolog, Descendant of a Neurotrophin Ancestor, Discloses the Early Molecular Evolution of Neurotrophins in the Vertebrate Subphylum
J. Neurosci., November 1, 1998; 18(21): 8700 - 8711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.