Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 10, 256-267, Copyright © 1993 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution
MT Dixon and DM Hillis
Using sequence data from the 28S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes of selected
vertebrates, we investigated the effects that constraints imposed by
secondary structure have on the phylogenetic analysis of rRNA sequence
data. Our analysis indicates that characters from both base-pairing regions
(stems) and non-base-pairing regions (loops) contain phylogenetic
information, as judged by the level of support of the phylogenetic results
compared with a well-established tree based on both morphological and
molecular data. The best results (the greatest level of support of
well-accepted nodes) were obtained when the complete data set was used.
However, some previously supported nodes were resolved using either the
stem or loop bases alone. Stem bases sustain a greater number of
compensatory mutations than would be expected at random, but the number is
< 40% of that expected under a hypothesis of perfect compensation to
maintain secondary structure. Therefore, we suggest that in phylogenetic
analyses, the weighting of stem characters be reduced by no more than 20%,
relative to that of loop characters. In contrast to previous suggestions,
we do not recommend weighting of stem positions by one-half, compared with
that of loop positions, because this overcompensates for the constraints
that selection imposes on the secondary structure of rRNA.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Ribosomal RNA secondary structure: compensatory mutations and implications for phylogenetic analysis
Department of Zoology, University of Texas, Austin 78712.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. E. Sims, S.-R. Jun, G. A. Wu, and S.-H. Kim Whole-genome phylogeny of mammals: Evolutionary information in genic and nongenic regions PNAS, October 6, 2009; 106(40): 17077 - 17082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Dohrmann, D. Janussen, J. Reitner, A. G. Collins, and G. Worheide Phylogeny and Evolution of Glass Sponges (Porifera, Hexactinellida) Syst Biol, June 1, 2008; 57(3): 388 - 405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Zhang, Y. Peng, W. Wang, and B. Su Rapid evolution of an X-linked microRNA cluster in primates Genome Res., May 1, 2007; 17(5): 612 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yu and J. L. Thorne Dependence among Sites in RNA Evolution Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2006; 23(8): 1525 - 1537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Gillespie, J. B. Munro, J. M. Heraty, M. J. Yoder, A. K. Owen, and A. E. Carmichael A Secondary Structural Model of the 28S rRNA Expansion Segments D2 and D3 for Chalcidoid Wasps (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2005; 22(7): 1593 - 1608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Castoe, T. M. Doan, and C. L. Parkinson Data Partitions and Complex Models in Bayesian Analysis: The Phylogeny of Gymnophthalmid Lizards Syst Biol, June 1, 2004; 53(3): 448 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Galtier Sampling Properties of the Bootstrap Support in Molecular Phylogeny: Influence of Nonindependence Among Sites Syst Biol, February 1, 2004; 53(1): 38 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Kelchner Group II introns as phylogenetic tools: structure, function, and evolutionary constraints Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2002; 89(10): 1651 - 1669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-Y. Wang and S.-C. Lee Secondary Structure of Mitochondrial 12S rRNA Among Fish and Its Phylogenetic Applications Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2002; 19(2): 138 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Yamamoto, H. Kasai, D. L. Arnold, R. W. Jackson, A. Vivian, and S. Harayama Phylogeny of the genus Pseudomonas: intrageneric structure reconstructed from the nucleotide sequences of gyrB and rpoD genes Microbiology, October 1, 2000; 146(10): 2385 - 2394. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. Billoud, M.-A. Guerrucci, M. Masselot, and J. S. Deutsch Cirripede Phylogeny Using a Novel Approach: Molecular Morphometrics Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2000; 17(10): 1435 - 1445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Alves-Gomes Systematic biology of gymnotiform and mormyriform electric fishes: phylogenetic relationships, molecular clocks and rates of evolution in the mitochondrial rRNA genes J. Exp. Biol., January 5, 1999; 202(10): 1167 - 1183. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Bromham, A. Rambaut, R. Fortey, A. Cooper, and D. Penny Testing the Cambrian explosion hypothesis by using a molecular dating technique PNAS, October 13, 1998; 95(21): 12386 - 12389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. M. Tillier and R. A. Collins High Apparent Rate of Simultaneous Compensatory Base-Pair Substitutions in Ribosomal RNA Genetics, April 1, 1998; 148(4): 1993 - 2002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Hillis, J. Huelsenbeck, and C. Cunningham Application and accuracy of molecular phylogenies Science, April 29, 1994; 264(5159): 671 - 677. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||








